Most of us agree that following Jesus is risky
business.
But how much risk is
reasonable?
Right now devout followers of Jesus in our nation find
themselves on both sides of the current refugee crisis.
Some believe we should freely open our
borders to the seemingly endless flow of humanity streaming out of Syria.
Some have advocated restricting that flow or
cutting it off altogether.
The arguments for the later are convincing.
What about our responsibility to protect our
own citizens?
What about the very real
possibility that terrorists will slip in undetected?
Is it not irresponsible, even immoral, to
jeopardize the safety of our own children?
Of course the recent tragedy in France proves that those
arguments are not without merit.
Personally, I want to come down on the side of
self-defense.
There’s a part of me, a
really big part, that says,
Close the
borders! Build walls! Erect razer fencing! Station armed guards at
every entry point! Low risk seems reasonable to me.
But as a person trying to follow Jesus I have a couple
problems...
1.
One problem is Church History
Rodney Stark, a noted historian, points out that the
outbreak of epidemics was not uncommon in the ancient Roman world.
In overcrowded cities, lack of sanitation and
limited medical expertise rendered ancient people defenseless against the
invading diseases.
In an effort to
reduce the risk of infection, many abandoned their infected family members in
the streets.
During the second great epidemic, around 260, Christians
responded differently.
Instead of
discarding loved ones in the streets, they rescued those discarded by
others.
Stark quotes an Easter letter
written by Dionysius, the Bishop of Alexandria.
Most of our brother Christians showed
unbounded love and loyalty, never sparing themselves and thinking only of one
another. Heedless of danger, they took
charge of the sick, attending to their every need and ministering to them in
Christ, and with them departed this life serenely happy; for they were infected
by others with the disease, drawing on themselves the sickness of their
neighbors and cheerfully accepting their pains.
Many, in nursing and curing others, transferred their death to
themselves and died in their stead. (Rodney
Stark, The Rise of Christianity, page
82.)
Because of their faith in Christ
and commitment to his teaching, these Christians put themselves at great risk
and apparently thought it reasonable to do so.
Some may deem this example
invalid.
After all, ministering to sick
people in your own city is not the same as opening your city (or state or
country) to outsiders who may intend to do you harm.
Maybe a closer correlation would
be the Christians, like Corrie Ten Boom and her family, who hid Jews from the
Nazis prior to and during WWII.
The
risks they took were multiple.
Among
those were the real possibility that Nazi sympathizers would pose as Jewish
refugees seeking sanctuary.
Every time
the Ten Boom family opened their doors to a Jew they were risking their own
lives.
Of course, for the Ten Boom family,
that risk became reality.
Their hiding
place was discovered.
They were arrested
and placed in German prison camps.
All
but Corrie died in those camps because being followers of Christ compelled them
to take risks, very great risks.
2.
The other problem is Jesus
I think it is safe to say that
Jesus was a risk taker and he taught his disciples that following him involved
risk.
Actually, maybe “risk” is not the
best word.
Jesus taught that following
him would result in
certain suffering.
Repeatedly he told his disciples
that they would be taking up their own crosses if they followed him.
In other words, following Jesus requires a
willingness to die.
The apostle Peter who, according
to tradition, was himself crucified upside down wrote, “
if you
suffer for doing good and you endure it, this is commendable before God.
To this you were called, because Christ suffered for you,
leaving you an example, that you should follow in his steps. (1 Peter 2:20-21)
In our modern western world we
think that risk should be eliminated.
But we must remember that following Jesus is inherently risky.
I want to keep my family safe.
Low risk sounds good to me.
But the teachings and example of Jesus Christ
compel us to risk everything to do the right thing.
Making room for refugees who need a safe
place to live is the right thing.
Is it
risky to open our doors to these neighbors?
Yes, it is.
But for Christ
followers, it is right to take the risk.